Microsoft BitLocker Reviews

We use Microsoft BitLocker to encrypt the data.

Before logging into the system, we enable Microsoft BitLocker so that the data will be automatically encrypted.

The best feature of Microsoft BitLocker is how it encrypts the data. The solution has a feature that automatically asks the users to upgrade their password once we set up the process. Microsoft BitLocker will not allow users to have the same password for the next five to six times.

The solution’s user interface could be improved.

I have been using Microsoft BitLocker for six to seven years.

Microsoft BitLocker is a stable solution.

Microsoft BitLocker is a scalable solution. More than 5,00,000 users are using the solution.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward for an end user.

Microsoft BitLocker is a cloud-based solution. I would recommend Microsoft BitLocker to other users. The solution's performance lags a little. Your process will get a bit slow whenever you start encrypting the data.

I rate the solution a five out of ten for ease of use and effectiveness.

Overall, I rate Microsoft BitLocker an eight out of ten.

Microsoft BitLocker can be used to ensure that stolen PCs or laptops do not lose their data.

We recently found some stability issues with Microsoft BitLocker. We found that quite a few users on the web are complaining about the solution's stability, especially after the Microsoft update. One user's laptop did not boot because of such an issue.

I have been using Microsoft BitLocker for about eight to ten years.

I rate Microsoft BitLocker a nine out of ten for stability.

Microsoft BitLocker's initial setup is extremely simple.

Microsoft BitLocker's pricing is included in the Microsoft license, and you don't have to pay an additional fee for it.

Microsoft BitLocker is directly deployed on the end user devices. Microsoft BitLocker is an encryption solution that ciphers the disk of the local machine. If you carry around your devices and somebody steals them, they cannot read the data off it even if they attach it to another device.

Microsoft BitLocker is directly deployed on the end user devices. Microsoft BitLocker is an encryption solution that ciphers the disk of the local machine. If you carry around your devices and somebody steals them, they cannot read the data off it even if they attach it to another device.

Using Microsoft BitLocker is very easy. After ciphering the data, it unlocks itself if you have a modern PC attached to the correct PC. However, you must have your old company username and password to create an account and see the data. You cannot see the data if you don't have the password. Nothing much can be done regarding the software's usability or evolution.

Microsoft BitLocker should not be considered as an end-user software. It's a system software that protects your hard disk.

Microsoft BitLocker is not hard to use.

Overall, I rate Microsoft BitLocker a nine out of ten.

We put BitLocker on all our consultants' laptops to protect their data in case they lose their machines.

I like the fact that you can get a BitLocker encryption key out of OneDrive.

BitLocker should be available on standard Windows. We need to spend money on a Pro license to get BitLocker because it's essential to protect our customers' data. We don't want that to fall into the wrong hands.

I have used BitLocker for five years.

BitLocker is stable.

We haven't rolled it out on a large scale. We're enabling it one computer at a time. 

BitLocker is pre-installed on Windows Pro, so you only need to switch it on. It takes a while to run, but you can switch it on and go do something else. It takes a minute or so to find it in the settings and enable it. 

BitLocker is included in the Windows Pro license. The Pro version of Windows costs about 100 pounds more than the Home Edition, so you need to decide if it's worth upgrading to Pro. That extra cost might be a tough pill for some companies to swallow, but it's necessary if you don't want to worry about your data if an employee loses their laptop. 

I rate Microsoft BitLocker 10 out of 10. It's a simple tool that does what it says. I recommend using it if you have access. 

It maintains security on my computer. Since I travel a lot, it gives me confidence that if, for some reason, my computer is lost, my data won't be compromised.

I am involved in a lot of work involving confidential information. So, it keeps unauthorized individuals away from my computer.

Microsoft BitLocker acts like a gatekeeper application that ensures computer security. It prevents unauthorized access and goes beyond security measures to safeguard the computer. It provides protection at a basic level.

I cannot think of any downsides to the solution at the time since it's very easy to recover my password if I forget my BitLocker password.

It would be great if there were levels of security where the basic level locks the whole computer but has a level where I could give access to an individual who could open read-only files. The solution lacks the ability to allow its user to provide limited access to someone. This is one feature that needs to be added to the solution.

I use Microsoft BitLocker on my personal computer. I have been using the solution for the last fifteen years.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I don't know how easy it is to use. We use it within our organization very easily. One can easily scale it from a small organization to a large one. So, I would rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution's customer service and support a ten out of ten.

Positive

The solution's initial setup was straightforward for me, who has worked as an IT professional to date.

The deployment model for the solution consists of not just the machine but also it is deployed in the cloud. Hence, it follows a dual-deployment model.

I would say that I have seen an ROI from the standpoint of the confidence a person gets knowing that their equipment is protected.

Since I work for an organization, I don't get involved in pricing. I'm more on the technical side. I think it's reasonably priced because I've never heard any complaints from my company about its costs.

I will tell those planning to use the solution that day to consider the current circumstances. So, the best thing to do is to use Microsoft BitLocker. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for cybersecurity purposes. 

Overall, it is a good solution. 

We need to understand many security requirements. We chose Bitlocker due to the fact that we had Windows 10 and needed something that could centralize everything for users. We have a team that is able to handle the maintenance easily.

It is easy to use and administer. 

The initial setup was straightforward. 

The solution is stable.

It's available via Windows 10.

It can scale well. 

The only improvement needed is a module that can centralize the keys better. It needs a management console. 

I've used the solution for two or three years. 

This is stable and reliable. We just need to figure out how to manage everything in a centralized way. However, there are no bugs or glitches. 

We have 100 users or so on the product. We plan to extend that number in the future as our endpoint strategy is to cover all laptops so that even those off-site will be protected. 

This is a scalable, reliable product. 

We have good, available support. We didn't need support during deployment even though we did have access to it. 

I did not previously use another solution in this company.

At another company, I did use. Symantec Endpoint Encryption. Symantec is a proper endpoint solution, and therefore it has a console manager. With Bitlocker, we lack that centralized console. 

There was a team that handled the deployment. The process was straightforward. It is easy to deploy and install. It also doesn't take too long to implement. We don't deploy it centrally. Our team contacts the end users of sensitive endpoints. For future mobility, the strategy is to ensure all users in the future will have this on their laptops. 

We have about five admins to handle the maintenance of the product. 

We implemented the product ourselves with our internal team. We had ten people dealing with the deployment. 

The ROI is good. It's already included in Microsoft Windows 10, which makes it easy to adopt. It saves us due to the lowered risk involved for users of laptops.

The pricing is very reasonable. Bitlocker is already included in Windows version 10. We do pay extra for technical support and potential maintenance.

We're looking for some sort of solution that can help us manage Bitlocker keys. 

I am a customer and end-user. 

We're moving towards having a solution that can manage user mobility, and we have to define a strategy that may include Bitdefender. Our future strategy is all about mobility.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd advise new users to compare it to other solutions and make sure they understand what Bitlocker can do. They may need an extra solution for managing Bitlocker.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. It's great. It just needs a management console. 

We primarily use the solution for encryption. 

You have to do a bit of reading to understand the logic; however, after that, it becomes pretty straightforward to use it.

Feature-wise we have the ability to encrypt fast. This means when you enforce the policy and when you onboard a device via the Azure AD, it comes online pretty quickly. The speed at which BitLocker engages is pretty strong. That's a significant thing. You can even control your external devices, like your USB devices. You can allow or deny, or even encrypt those devices. There are lots of useful things like that available in this product.

In terms of improvement, they should look at file encryption. When the files are being moved out or something, sometimes we need encryption in transit. Meaning when your system, your laptop you're using, the files are idle, then they are encrypted. And if you are sending the files out, let's say you're mailing the files out, that's data in transit. The encryption over there is controlled differently. It depends on what tool you're using for sending the files. However, the encryption is controlled there. The thing is, if you could have one single point of the solution, no matter if you're using Office 365 as an organization, to have just one encryption system across multiple systems, rather than having one BitLocker on the drive, then another encryption rule-set for sending an email, that would be easier.

Maybe the solution could use some more capability within the reporting system, et cetera. The reporting in Microsoft is very minimal. If you had a third-party tool, they will give you very high-level, very detailed reporting across various categories and conditions. Microsoft doesn't do that. That's a huge drawback in the system. You open the control, you get a lot of information; however, that information, you can't export.

I’ve been using the solution for almost a year now.

The solution is absolutely stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable.

We currently have about 150 people using the solution across every level of the organization.

Scalability doesn't really come into play since it's applicable only to the endpoint. BitLocker is applied to the laptop. You can set the policy to apply to all the drives on the laptop, and you can set the policy when the system is starting up and ask for a pin or just run it without the pin when it starts up. All that stuff is configuration-driven. There's no issue with scalability there. It just applies to all the machines, and once encrypted, all the machines will report to the central consoles.

Technical support varies since Microsoft tech support is outsourced to other organizations partnering with Microsoft. Therefore, even though I'm raising a ticket with Microsoft, it can go anywhere across the globe. Eventually, it is a third-party organization that's representing Microsoft that will handle the ticket.

The problem is the individual's expertise will vary. Some of them are very well versed in a particular product. Some are not so well versed. Eventually what happens is if they're not so well versed, then they'll go back to the Microsoft documentation and give you details based on that, and they'll work it out with you. The important thing is they always make it a point to achieve case closure. I'm not saying that it's very brilliant, however, it does a very good job. 80-90% of the time, it actually works.

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution, however, the critical thing to note is Windows 10 and 11 come with built-in encryption enabled. You have to disable that encryption. Only then will your centralized policy for BitLocker take over. Otherwise, it will throw up an error.

The initial setup is pretty simple. You might have to do a bit of education in terms of understanding the logic, however, after that, it’s all very simple.

For the actual deployment, basically, I did it in pieces. I did the initial deployment on my laptop. I had raised queries with Microsoft Support for this. Once I got the basic settings in place, I stabilized this as my policy, and then I drove it out to all my users.

I handled the initial setup myself. I didn’t need the help of any integrators or consultants.

You only have to pay for it. BitLocker is already present within the operating system. It's part of the OS. When you buy your laptop or a desktop, BitLocker is already present. The important thing here is the configuration part of it. BitLocker comes on your laptop, and it's 128-bit encryption, which comes by default. It's the unmanaged variety. The managed variety can be 128 or 256 bits. As a matter of industrial practice, we will all deploy 256 versions and there's no software cost coming in.

The important thing here is the deployment tool that you have. There are lots of tools in the market. Microsoft has an app called Intune, which gives you native control of the system. If you don't use Microsoft, if you don't have Intune, then you could look at some other products which give you control over the native encryption rather than deploying their own. Many products are there in the endpoint security domain which provides you encryption. If I decide to go that route, I will disable the BitLocker on both and I will apply this encryption software. However, I’m forced to rely on that encryption tool to do that management.

I’m using the latest edition. I started off on a trial basis for a couple of weeks, and now I've taken it to production. All my laptops are now on BitLocker.

I’d rate the solution nine out of ten.

If you want a free solution and work on Microsoft, use Windows BitLocker. That should do the job for you. Unless otherwise explicitly required for business needs, Encryption is basically a compliance requirement from an audit compliance requirement perspective. Encryption of your hard drives is a compliance requirement. However, there are businesses and industries wherein the data has to be encrypted, and it’s mandatory. This is not an issue of compliance for them. It's a work requirement. In those kinds of scenarios, then you would have to probably look at third-party solutions, which give you something beyond just the basic encryption. If you want to do basic encryption and you have your Intune, just use that. No money needs to be spent. You just need to put a little effort into creating a policy to push and apply to all the systems. End of story. However, if you have something more significant, you may have to look at other solutions.

We use the solution for encryption.

Microsoft BitLocker is a Microsoft native product that provides good encryption.

The solution should have a better user interface and dashboard.

I have been using Microsoft BitLocker for four to five years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

Around 80,000 users use the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.

The solution's technical support team asks for a lot of logs.

Neutral

The solution's competitor is Trellix. Trellix is a bit better than Microsoft BitLocker because it has a very good reporting feature.

The solution's initial setup is complex.

I deployed the solution by myself in a couple of days.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.

The solution's recovery option works fine to support our data security strategy. We integrate the Azure OpenAI tool with Microsoft BitLocker. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft BitLocker to encrypt employee devices for data protection.

The platform provides good performance.

The deployment process regarding prerequisites and automation could be easy to understand. It could be more transparent. Documentation should be more accessible and simplified, particularly directed towards small organizations, making it understandable for smaller setups.

A centralized management console with a web interface or dashboard for an implementation overview could exist.

We have 20 Microsoft BitLocker users in our organization. I want to deploy it on as many systems as possible for clients or users.

I refer to the support's knowledge base to resolve any issues.

The initial setup must be easy, but I couldn't understand the process. Some devices can automatically activate it. However, the documentation makes it seem like a complicated project to deploy. I would like to understand clearly how it works.

We work with an external IT service provider for the deployment.

The product's cost is included in Windows.

I recommend Microsoft BitLocker. It protects our endpoints and company data and helps secure the infrastructure. In case of suspicious activity, our data remains inaccessible.

However, they should also explore other easier options for IT professionals to understand. I rate the platform a six out of ten.