Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Arista and Nokia are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Arista is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Nokia is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. Arista holds a 3.0% mindshare in ES, compared to Nokia’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nokia users who would recommend it.
Arista Networks Platform
Read 27 Arista Networks Platform reviews
  • 4,539 Views
  • 3,059 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Read 6 Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reviews
  • 843 Views
  • 540 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Arista Networks Platform and Nokia Ethernet Service Switch are competitors in the networking hardware market. Arista Networks Platform is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while Nokia Ethernet Service Switch stands out with a robust feature set and value.

Features: Arista Networks Platform is recognized for automation capabilities, seamless third-party integration, and support for EVPN and VXLAN. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch includes comprehensive security features, extensive traffic management solutions, and advanced data aggregation for enhanced device utilization.

Room for Improvement: Arista Networks Platform could enhance its security features, offer more extensive traffic management solutions, and improve its complex legacy support integration. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, enhancing customer interface, and offering more competitive pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista Networks Platform provides a straightforward deployment with excellent customer support for seamless implementation. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch requires a more complex process for deployment but is supported by a dedicated team that ensures efficient issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Arista Networks Platform offers competitive pricing with favorable ROI due to lower setup costs and operational efficiencies. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch, although more expensive initially, offers extended value through advanced features that justify the higher price.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 855,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Arista Networks Platform
Ranking in Ethernet Switches
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Data Center Networking (4th)
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Ranking in Ethernet Switches
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Arista Networks Platform is 3.0%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Ethernet Switches
 

Featured Reviews

Md. Ashraf-Ud-Dowla - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances network security and reliability, but the cost is too high
In Arista Networks Platform, the network building is very good. It is also a wireless network tool, so it can be easily made available for our customers in hours for multiple data centers. For network scaling, it is very easy to adhere to and configure the benefits in the network insights. There is nothing complex since you just add the node and upload the profile, so it is very simplified. Integration process. The integration on a new host is sometimes tricky, but Arista Networks Platform's integration is straightforward.
Read full review
Teuku Maiyasya - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution which is competitively priced and offers good support
We would like to have an unified monitoring system, while Nokia have different monitoring system for different product, we find it to be quite troublesome. I also would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use. This would obviate the need to purchase individual licenses for each feature.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."
"The solution is very stable."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We find the CloudVision switching feature of this solution really useful."
"It is very stable. It has good hardware and very stable code. It provides good value for its price. They are a very lean type of organization, so they are very responsive, and they're able to focus more on their platform versus having multiple products out there."
"Arista Networks Platform is comfortable, easy to deploy, and easy to manage, with non-blocking technology. Additionally, it has a useful CloudVision platform and automation capabilities."
"The most valuable features of Arista include low latency, scalability, and sustainability of the products."
More Arista Networks Platform pros
"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."
"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."
"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."
"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."
"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."
"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."
 

Cons

"The solution is quite expensive. One of the negative aspects of it is the pricing."
"I want the solution to include a unified controller."
"My company does face issues in terms of interoperability when it comes to the product, making it an area that needs to be fixed."
"A smoother transition between ISPs during failover would improve the user experience by reducing unnecessary notifications and interruptions."
"A weakness would be that in our company, we don't have many people within our team who support the product because there are different vendors, and most of them are not tier-one vendors, so the skills required sometimes are just not there."
"The overall price of the Arista Networks Platform is expensive. It should be reduced."
"The product fails to offer functions related to cloud orchestration, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers."
More Arista Networks Platform cons
"I would like to see more collaboration with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) vendors, such as Itron."
"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."
"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."
"The solution needs more monitoring tools."
"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."
"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."
"Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."
"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."
"Arista Networks Platform was cheaper than Cisco. I have heard that the product is affordable for enterprise-sized companies."
"Specific tools definitely require a license for the subscription. But we are not using these tools in our environment. In terms of licensing, you need to spend approximately $10,000 per month."
"Network devices are generally expensive. However, during the evaluation, Arista was the most inexpensive vendor."
"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."
"I remember that when our customers were offered the Arista Networks Platform, they used a checklist to compare the prices between Arista and Cisco for their requirements, and found that the prices were almost the same."
More Arista Networks Platform pricing and cost advice
"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."
"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arista Networks Platform?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Networks Platform?
Arista products are perceived as costly, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?
Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers. Feature-wise, it addresses most customer requirements. However, we sometimes face challenges when integrating with proprietary protocols and solut...
See all answers
What do you like most about Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?
The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?
In my opinion, Nokia has to improve its documentation, offering step-by-step configuration guides and examples of what outputs look like on Windows. There should also be a comparison of commands be...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?
I have been working with Nokia switches for six months. Before that, I was using Cisco devices. I am involved in configuring Nokia Internet Service Switches in our network.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform Logo
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform
Compared 19% of the time
Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform Logo
Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Meraki MS Switches vs Arista Networks Platform Logo
Meraki MS Switches vs Arista Networks Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco Nexus vs Arista Networks Platform Logo
Cisco Nexus vs Arista Networks Platform
Compared 9% of the time
MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Arista Networks Platform Logo
MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Arista Networks Platform
Compared 3% of the time
More Arista Networks Platform Competitors
Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Logo
Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Compared 54% of the time
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Logo
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Compared 17% of the time
Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Logo
Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Compared 8% of the time
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Logo
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Compared 7% of the time
More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Arista Networks Platform
June 2025
Arista Networks Platform reportDownload Arista Networks Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Ethernet Switches
June 2025
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reportDownload Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report
 

Also Known As

7000 Series
Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS
 

Overview

Arista Networks Platform is a stable and reliable solution for data center features, specifically for non-blocking switches used for spine-leaf connectivity with servers hooked to these switches. It also provides multi-layer switches for client networks, particularly in the banking sector. 

Arista products are preferred for their stability, good hardware, ease of adoption and configuration, responsive and helpful support, and high throughput ratings. The solution has helped prevent screen loss and business outages in the media industry and is designed for next-generation data centers.

Arista

The Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch (ESS) family of Carrier Ethernet switch routers is designed to deliver advanced Carrier Ethernet services. It also provides the ideal platform for the metro Ethernet aggregation of fixed and mobile networks.

Nokia
 

Sample Customers

American Internet Services
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
June 2025
Free Report: Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch
Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

OSZAR »