GitHub Code Scanning vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comparison

GitHub and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6, while Sonar is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. GitHub holds a 1.2% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 5 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

815 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Read 15 SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) reviews

7,829 Views
682 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Cloud and GitHub Code Scanning compete in the code analysis space. SonarQube Cloud is favored for its comprehensive features, while GitHub Code Scanning excels due to its seamless integration capabilities.

Features: SonarQube Cloud is valued for code inspection, addressing technical debt, and identifying security vulnerabilities, particularly for Java applications. It integrates well with CI/CD tools and offers a user-friendly interface. GitHub Code Scanning simplifies versioning through GitHub, provides static code analysis identifying vulnerabilities, and enhances code quality through automation features. The ease of providing AI functionalities and metric dashboards is also notable.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube Cloud could improve by reducing setup complexity and enhancing documentation, especially for CI/CD integrations. Additionally, addressing false positives in large organizations and simplifying integration would be beneficial. GitHub Code Scanning could expand its feature set to provide more detailed reporting and improve handling of code vulnerabilities at a deeper level. The pricing model could be reviewed for more attractive initial adoption cost, and there could be finer control over scanning functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Cloud offers straightforward deployment through its cloud-native architecture, providing responsive customer support. GitHub Code Scanning benefits from integration with GitHub, making deployment simple for users already on GitHub, and leveraging existing infrastructure for customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Cloud offers competitive pricing and strong ROI through its broad feature set, providing more upfront value for new users. GitHub Code Scanning, although higher in initial cost, offers long-term value to existing GitHub users due to its integration, justifying the investment for those leveraging GitHub's broader ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is 5.4%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Archana Verma

Security Analyst at Dover Corporation

Provides valuable insights on code vulnerabilities and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines

I find SonarQube Cloud to be very user-friendly with an easy-to-use interface. It provides detailed code smell reports and insights on hotspots, which can later represent security vulnerabilities. It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives. It is integrated easily with the CI/CD pipeline, saving time and cost. It provides information on upcoming vulnerability details and loopholes that might turn into vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The static code analysis capability in GitHub Code Scanning is a very powerful feature, providing the ability to identify vulnerabilities and ensure code quality."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"It's very scalable, very easy to handle, and very intuitive."

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."

"The most valuable features of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) include code inspection, addressing technical debt, and identifying security vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of SonarCloud are the ability to discover vulnerabilities, security weak points, security hotspots, and all the feedback that comes into the feature branch. You can deploy the code with the security, you can eliminate the problem at the developer level rather than identifying the problem in the productions."

"I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially."

"The solution can be installed locally."

"I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially."

"The reports from SonarCloud are very good."

"SonarCloud is overall a good tool for identifying code smells, bugs, and code duplication, but we've found that using Android Lint is more effective for our needs."

"I find SonarQube Cloud to be very user-friendly with an easy-to-use interface."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) pros

Cons

"When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when checking in or merging a PR would be beneficial."

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"At times it becomes very annoying as it highlights certain things which are intuitive. They require code coverage for those aspects as an extra overhead."

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."

"I've been told by the developers that the solution is too limited. It's not testing enough within the containers."

"There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase."

"CI/CD pipeline is part of a whole chain of design, development, and production, and it's becoming increasingly crucial to optimize the various tools across different stages. However, it's still a silo approach because the full integration is missing. This isn't just an issue with SonarCloud. It's a general problem with tooling."

"The UI can be improved."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode. Additionally, it has fewer capabilities, which prompted us to use Veracode."

"SonarCloud can improve the false positives. Sometimes the gates sometimes act a little weird. We then need to manually go and mark the false positive."

"SonarCloud's UI needs enhancement."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."

"I am using the free version of the solution."

"The current pricing is quite cheap."

"While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."

"The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The organization pays for the license of GitHub Code Scanning, but specific price details are unknown.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when check...

See all answers

What do you like most about SonarCloud?

Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonarCloud?

From my experience, SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is very expensive for small companies. It would be a great improvement if the price for smaller companies were reduced, as I do not have th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonarCloud?

I need a solution that can bring together three key areas: vulnerabilities, static scanning, and misarchitecture. Currently, to achieve our expectations, we have to use more than one product, as so...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 34% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 29% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 53% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

May 2025

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) report

Download SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) product report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

GitHub

Sonar

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.

SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.

What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies potential security threats within code.
Security Hotspots: Highlights sections of the code that require closer inspection.
Feedback on Feature Branches: Enables early detection and resolution of quality issues.
No Maintenance: Ensures focus remains on development rather than tool upkeep.
Mono and Multi-Reports: Offers diverse insights into code quality.

What benefits should users look for?

Integration Ease: Seamlessly connects with popular development platforms.
Continuous Code Analysis: Provides consistent feedback to improve code standards.
Unified Quality View: Dashboard offers a comprehensive look at code metrics.
Security Insights: Detailed information on vulnerabilities and their impact.

In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.

Sonar

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.