GitLab and Snyk are key players in the development workflows category. GitLab holds an edge with its comprehensive DevOps capabilities, while Snyk excels in security features.
Features: GitLab is ideal for developers seeking comprehensive source-code management and automation, with features such as repository control, branch management, and CI/CD pipelines. Snyk stands out for its strong security features, including vulnerability detection and seamless integration with IDEs, providing robust protection against code vulnerabilities.
Room for Improvement: GitLab users face integration challenges with AWS and Jira and desire more advanced Agile project management features in lower-tier versions. Improved security and user interface enhancements are also sought. Snyk could benefit from better notification systems, deeper programming language integrations, and enhanced plugin usability, with a particular emphasis on expanding dynamic scanning features like SAST/DAST.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab and Snyk offer flexible deployment across different environments. GitLab users appreciate its extensive community resources but note slower direct support response times. Snyk offers responsive customer service and strong community engagement. Both solutions rely heavily on community forums for their free versions, though GitLab's higher tiers provide superior support experiences.
Pricing and ROI: GitLab's freemium model provides flexibility with an evolving pricing structure, whereas Snyk's pricing, although high, is justified by the robust value of its security tools. GitLab’s model is scalable, accommodating team growth, while Snyk offers a strong cost-to-benefit ratio, emphasizing security, making it a preferred option for many organizations despite its expenses.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.