Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jamf Pro vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Intune reduces costs and boosts efficiency by automating device management, enhancing security, and integrating with Microsoft services.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jamf Pro automates device management, improving efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing security, ultimately yielding rapid investment returns and stability.
Sentiment score
5.0
Users of ManageEngine Endpoint Central noted quick returns, reduced costs, and automation benefits, despite some facing specific challenges.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
Applications are deployed through Intune, and we see fewer tickets for common issues because we can resolve them through the solution.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Intune's support is mixed; premium service excels, while basic support and response times can vary significantly.
Sentiment score
8.0
Jamf Pro's customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some improvements in response time are suggested.
Sentiment score
6.0
ManageEngine Endpoint Central's support is praised for responsiveness but criticized for delays, communication, and inconsistent quality, especially regionally.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
The vendor support is excellent.
The support team is available via chat and will create a ticket if they're not available, providing assistance even for small issues.
While they are generally good, there could be improvements in their response times to align with our SLAs.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Microsoft Intune is scalable, easily managing diverse endpoints and devices in organizations of all sizes through cloud-based licensing.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jamf Pro offers scalable, flexible device management for organizations, accommodating diverse deployment sizes without infrastructure changes, ideal for various sectors.
Sentiment score
7.1
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is highly scalable, easily integrates licenses, and manages numerous endpoints efficiently, though initial setup can be intricate.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
Jamf Pro is a fully scalable solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Intune offers reliable performance but faces minor issues in application deployment, synchronization, and occasional update delays.
Sentiment score
8.8
Jamf Pro is stable and reliable, with cloud hosting enhancing performance and quick resolution of rare issues.
Sentiment score
8.2
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is stable and reliable, with swift bug fixes and high stability ratings, despite minor update delays.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
A couple of years ago, the performance was not as good as it is now, but there are noticeable backend improvements.
The product is very stable, especially with the cloud version.
We haven't encountered issues very frequently.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Intune requires enhancements in reporting, device support, integration, user interface, security, management tools, and cost efficiency.
Jamf Pro users seek better patch management, intuitive interface, improved support, lower costs, and broader integration beyond Apple devices.
Users criticize ManageEngine Endpoint Central for support delays, interface confusion, high pricing, and request more features and improvements.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
The biggest area for improvement is the price and the structure of Jamf's onboarding process, especially the mandatory JumpStart consultation, which can be costly for small organizations.
It would be great if there was a smarter solution to address this issue.
Endpoint Central does not support Linux, which makes it challenging to patch Linux machines using commands.
The patch management module could be simplified as it is currently a bit complicated.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Intune pricing varies by business size, with bundled Microsoft 365 options offering better value than standalone solutions.
Jamf Pro offers premium Apple device management, justified pricing, cloud services, training, and discounts, benefiting businesses and schools.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is cost-effective but requires careful understanding of complex licensing and potential extra fees.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The pricing structure is one of the cons.
ManageEngine products offer reasonable prices for their product quality.
The pricing is cheaper compared to other MDM products.
The pricing of ManageEngine Endpoint Central is quite decent.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Intune integrates with Office 365, Azure, providing remote device management, security, seamless updates, and centralized control benefits.
Jamf Pro offers zero-touch deployment, remote management, automation, and easy integration with Apple's DEP, enhancing IT efficiency and user empowerment.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central excels in patch management, software deployment, and asset management, enhancing productivity and security for IT teams.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
The product automatically updates to include new security features, ensuring that customers are always using the latest version of macOS and app packages.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is straightforward to use and implement.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central has significantly simplified my device management practices.
The GUI of Endpoint Central is very user-friendly, which simplifies the process of training new users.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
270
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (2nd), Remote Access (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Jamf Pro
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
3rd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Device Management (MDM) (1st)
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Ranking in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Client Desktop Management (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 33.5%, down from 37.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Pro is 11.8%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Endpoint Central is 6.7%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
 

Featured Reviews

Joseph Merusi - PeerSpot reviewer
Everything has worked better since we started using it
Sometimes the syncing is inconsistent. I'm confident that the devices are checking in every eight hours, but sometimes the devices aren't picking up the settings as quickly as I would expect. Some features haven't been updated in a while, and Microsoft doesn't seem interested in developing them. Unless you talk to an engineer, you don't know whether there will be an update. There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now. Some reporting areas still need development. For example, I noticed that the reporting for driver updates is still confusing.
Arunachalam S. - PeerSpot reviewer
Simplifies device management, making performing various administrative tasks easier
Sometimes, the server gets slow. The dashboard is only getting loaded. Jamf Pro offers many features, but some improvements could make it even more user-friendly. For example, streamlining authentication controls would enhance its security value. Too many complex settings on the dashboard make it hard for users to navigate. Simplifying the settings would make it easier to use. Adding a more interactive and cleaner UI design would also improve the user experience. Additionally, automatically categorizing policies and configurations by type would be helpful, making the dashboard more organized. Introducing auto-filtering based on categories would streamline configuration management. On the security side, enabling two-factor authentication for console login would provide better protection than single sign-on. Only authorized users can access sensitive data, like the asset inventory stored in the console. 2FA would help keep the system secure, preventing unauthorized access even if login credentials are compromised. Device management needs automation, and Jamf is likely to integrate Apple's Apple Intelligence into its framework once it's available. This integration is expected to be a significant enhancement for the Jamf console, potentially transforming the way device management is handled.
Charles A - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective vulnerability, desktop, and patch management
We are using ManageEngine Endpoint Central primarily for desktop management. It allows us to deploy patches, manage antivirus, control endpoints like DLP, and more The most valuable feature to me is the vulnerability management. It also has effective patch management capabilities. The main issue…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.
855,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
University
6%
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
What do you like most about Jamf Pro?
The most valuable features of Jamf Pro for me are the device locator, which helps find missing iPads, and the ability...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Pro?
The pricing structure is one of the cons. However, the licensing model is simple and easy to manage from an MSP persp...
What needs improvement with Jamf Pro?
The biggest area for improvement is the price and the structure of Jamf's onboarding process, especially the mandator...
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. Wh...
What do you like most about ManageEngine Endpoint Central?
Well, what we like is that it catch actually a lot of features constantly upgrading. So all the three maybe there the...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Endpoint Central?
The pricing is cheaper compared to other MDM products, but I don't remember the exact details.
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
JAMF Software Casper Suite
ManageEngine Desktop Central, Desktop Central, ManageEngine Desktop Management MSP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Xero, National Geographic, Oxford University, Via, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Fallon, Cabela's
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Strathallan School, BMI Healthcare, Comercial Kywi, First Priority Federal Credit Union, Gerab National Enterprises
Find out what your peers are saying about Jamf Pro vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
855,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OSZAR »