Top 10 Google Security Operations Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

4 reviews
83% willing to recommend

Top Google Security Operations Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Google Security Operations based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Google Security Operations surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, real-time incident response, and robust automation, ensuring optimal protection, streamlined processes, and comprehensive security coverage to meet the demands of modern enterprises.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon appeals to buyers seeking advanced threat detection and dedicated support, while Google Security Operations excels in cloud-native security and seamless integration with its ecosystem. In comparison, CrowdStrike offers a higher ROI through comprehensive protection, whereas Google provides cost-effective solutions for cloud-centric users.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Google Security Operations Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon reviews highlight a straightforward setup cost with efficient deployment, whereas Google Security Operations is noted for its competitive pricing but involves more complex initial setup procedures.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Sentinel

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Sentinel

4.1 out of 5

Google Security Operations excels in cost efficiency with machine learning-powered threat detection. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's strength lies in its robust analytics and AI capabilities. Google Security Operations' streamlined integration suits budget-conscious buyers, while Microsoft Sentinel attracts those valuing comprehensive features and support.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report

Pricing

Google Security Operations offers a streamlined setup cost that appeals to cost-conscious businesses, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup cost is higher but includes robust integration capabilities, making it more suitable for complex environments.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk Enterprise Security

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Enterprise Security

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Enterprise Security excels in behavioral analytics and threat detection with flexible deployment options and competitive pricing, catering to diverse environments. In comparison, Google Security Operations offers seamless integration and scalability, ideal for cloud-centric organizations seeking advanced features and strategic long-term value.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report

Pricing

Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher setup costs, whereas Google Security Operations typically presents a more cost-effective setup process. This distinction highlights the financial considerations when choosing between these security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar excels in threat detection and hybrid deployments, appealing to those needing advanced analytics across diverse environments. In comparison, Google Security Operations provides seamless integration and scalability, attracting buyers seeking cost-effective solutions with a focus on cloud-native features and efficient service.

Download Google Security Operations vs. IBM Security QRadar Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar involves significant initial setup costs, while Google Security Operations offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup. This distinction highlights QRadar's higher initial investment compared to Google's budget-friendly approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Google Security Operations appeals with seamless Google integration and cost-effectiveness, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR attracts with extensive automation and incident management, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced orchestration and long-term ROI.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Report

Pricing

Google Security Operations offers a more streamlined setup with lower costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR may involve higher setup investments.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Security Operations offers a more streamlined setup with lower costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR may involve higher setup investments.

Cortex XSIAM

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XSIAM

4.2 out of 5

Google Security Operations excels in seamless Google Cloud integration and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for Google-centric environments. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM's AI-driven threat detection and flexibility support complex, multi-cloud setups, offering substantial value despite a higher upfront investment.

Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Google Security Operations Report

Pricing

Google Security Operations has a straightforward setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM involves a more complex pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Security Operations has a straightforward setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM involves a more complex pricing structure.

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

Google Security Operations, favored for seamless cloud-native security within Google Cloud environments, attracts cloud-focused organizations seeking easy integration and reduced costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR appeals to businesses needing sophisticated automation and orchestration across multi-platform contexts, justifying its higher setup investment.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Google Security Operations involves lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR tends to be more expensive to implement. Users may weigh these pricing strategies when comparing these industry-leading security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Sumo Logic Security

4.2 out of 5

Sumo Logic Security

4.2 out of 5

Sumo Logic Security offers cost-effective log analytics with excellent customer support, making it ideal for mid-sized enterprises. In comparison, Google Security Operations integrates seamlessly within its ecosystem, providing advanced threat detection, suitable for large organizations demanding comprehensive security and integration.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Sumo Logic Security Report

Pricing

Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, whereas Google Security Operations has a higher initial investment, differentiating their pricing strategies significantly.

View comparison

Pricing

Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, whereas Google Security Operations has a higher initial investment, differentiating their pricing strategies significantly.

Exabeam

3.9 out of 5

Exabeam

3.9 out of 5

Exabeam excels with advanced analytics and flexible deployment, appealing to those prioritizing affordability and ease of use. In comparison, Google Security Operations attracts tech buyers seeking integration with Google Cloud and long-term value through its comprehensive features and machine learning capabilities.

Download Exabeam vs. Google Security Operations Report

Pricing

Exabeam's setup cost is significantly higher than Google Security Operations. Google provides a lower initial investment, while Exabeam requires more upfront, possibly reflecting the complexity and depth of its installation and implementation process.

View comparison

Pricing

Sentinel

3.8 out of 5

Sentinel

3.8 out of 5

Sentinel offers competitive pricing and quick deployment, ideal for budget-conscious organizations requiring immediate implementation. In comparison, Google Security Operations requires a higher investment but provides advanced analytics and integration with Google Cloud, suitable for those seeking extensive capabilities and deeper insights.

Download Google Security Operations vs. Sentinel Report

Pricing

Sentinel's setup cost is user-friendly, making it an economical choice for many, while Google Security Operations requires higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive range of features.

View comparison

Pricing

Sentinel's setup cost is user-friendly, making it an economical choice for many, while Google Security Operations requires higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive range of features.

Show 6 more products

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms