Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo

Top 10 Check Point Harmony Endpoint Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
1,005 followers
Start review

Top Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony Endpoint based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony Endpoint surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat prevention, advanced threat intelligence, and seamless integration with existing systems, ensuring unmatched security and streamlined operations to protect sensitive data and prevent cyber threats effectively.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive endpoint security with features like anti-ransomware and compliance, favored for detailed threat emulation. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR with strong cloud-native threat detection, appealing to buyers prioritizing advanced functionalities despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon comes with higher initial expenses. Customer reviews indicate a significant price difference favoring Check Point Harmony Endpoint for those concerned with budget efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon comes with higher initial expenses. Customer reviews indicate a significant price difference favoring Check Point Harmony Endpoint for those concerned with budget efficiency.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint outshines its competitor with superior features, making the additional cost worthwhile. While Harmony Endpoint provides easy deployment, Defender’s advanced capabilities justify its higher price, appealing to tech buyers.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is less cost-effective during setup compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is less cost-effective during setup compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers user-friendly management and efficient threat detection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides comprehensive threat intelligence and robust automation. Check Point Harmony Endpoint ensures easy deployment and competitive pricing, while Fortinet FortiEDR impresses with advanced features and strong security, justifying its investment.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a high setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower upfront expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a high setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower upfront expense.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in threat prevention and cost-effectiveness, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete's AI-driven detection makes it valuable for sophisticated security needs. Improved performance is desired for Check Point, while advanced reporting is sought for SentinelOne.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a low initial setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a low initial setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher upfront investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust support and pricing that users appreciate, focusing on advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR stands out with its extensive features, advanced detection, and integration with other Microsoft tools.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, which offers a more extensive feature set but comes with a higher price.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, which offers a more extensive feature set but comes with a higher price.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a user-friendly design and comprehensive threat prevention, making it ideal for easy management and quick ROI. In comparison, Cortex XDR excels with advanced threat detection and extensive analytics, appealing to organizations needing detailed security insights and cross-platform protection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a cost-effective setup for small to mid-sized businesses while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a higher initial investment targeting enterprise-level security demands but provides more robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a cost-effective setup for small to mid-sized businesses while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a higher initial investment targeting enterprise-level security demands but provides more robust features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its ease of deployment and customer service, appealing to those valuing simplicity and support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient stands out for its comprehensive security features, including extensive endpoint protection and advanced threat intelligence, ideal for robust security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Fortinet FortiClient. Harmony Endpoint's advanced features contribute to its higher price, while FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly option with essential security functions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Fortinet FortiClient. Harmony Endpoint's advanced features contribute to its higher price, while FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly option with essential security functions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat prevention and is praised for straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Elastic Security provides integrated threat intelligence and scalable analytics but is noted for complex deployment and higher costs. Each solution caters to different priorities in enterprise security.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Elastic Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a generally lower setup cost compared to Elastic Security. Elastic Security is known for its higher initial investment despite offering extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a generally lower setup cost compared to Elastic Security. Elastic Security is known for its higher initial investment despite offering extensive features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for its competitive pricing and robust threat protection, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint delivers advanced features such as anti-phishing and sandboxing techniques, justifying its higher cost with superior security functionalities and better overall protection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Harmony Endpoint is more cost-effective. Symantec's extensive features come at a premium, unlike Check Point's affordable pricing with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Harmony Endpoint is more cost-effective. Symantec's extensive features come at a premium, unlike Check Point's affordable pricing with essential functionalities.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in real-time threat detection and seamless security integration, making it ideal for simplicity-focused buyers. In comparison, HP Wolf Security, with its advanced AI-driven features and strong malware protection, appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive endpoint security despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. HP Wolf Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically requires a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. The higher cost of Check Point Harmony Endpoint may reflect its advanced features compared to HP Wolf Security.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically requires a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. The higher cost of Check Point Harmony Endpoint may reflect its advanced features compared to HP Wolf Security.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint leads in pricing and customer support, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Tanium's superior features and real-time data analysis make it a preferred choice despite higher costs. Check Point excels in ease of deployment, while Tanium focuses on advanced capabilities and integration.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Tanium Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint users report a low setup cost, while Tanium users highlight a higher initial setup expense. This pricing difference is a significant factor when considering initial investment and budgeting for cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint users report a low setup cost, while Tanium users highlight a higher initial setup expense. This pricing difference is a significant factor when considering initial investment and budgeting for cybersecurity solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is preferred for its anti-ransomware and zero-day protection. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint stands out for its XDR and threat hunting. Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in deployment ease, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers better long-term ROI despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are lower compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which often requires a higher initial investment. Cisco Secure Endpoint offers additional features that may justify the higher expense for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are lower compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which often requires a higher initial investment. Cisco Secure Endpoint offers additional features that may justify the higher expense for some users.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for its comprehensive threat prevention and ease of use. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security emphasizes AI-driven threat detection and detailed analytics. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for cost-effectiveness, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security justifies its higher price with advanced features.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, making Trend Vision One more cost-effective initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, making Trend Vision One more cost-effective initially.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in threat detection and response, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing these features. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers a comprehensive protection suite and advanced anti-malware tools, appealing to those needing an extensive, all-encompassing security solution.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, making Kaspersky a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, making Kaspersky a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is favored for its advanced threat protection and flexible policy management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. Trellix's competitive pricing attracts buyers, while Check Point's extensive features offer enhanced security benefits, justifying its higher cost.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is typically high but justified by the robust features, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more affordable setup cost, making it an economical option for budget-conscious users. The key difference lies in the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is typically high but justified by the robust features, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more affordable setup cost, making it an economical option for budget-conscious users. The key difference lies in the initial investment required.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust threat intelligence and competitive pricing. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat prevention and zero-day protection, making it worth the higher investment. ESET is praised for straightforward deployment, while Check Point provides superior customer service.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is often described as straightforward and affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for being higher but justified by comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is often described as straightforward and affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for being higher but justified by comprehensive features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat prevention and zero-day attack protection, while Intercept X Endpoint excels with deep learning and anti-ransomware capabilities. In comparison, users favor Intercept X for innovative technology and simplicity. Check Point provides competitive pricing, and Intercept X is valued for its effectiveness.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is generally higher due to its extensive security features, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a more affordable initial setup. Harmony Endpoint eliminates the need for multiple security products with its comprehensive suite, a benefit not matche...
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is generally higher due to its extensive security features, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a more affordable initial setup. Harmony Endpoint eliminates the need for multiple security products with its comprehensive suite, a benefit not matche...
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is praised for its pricing and inventory management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint stands out for its advanced threat prevention and superior security features. BigFix's deployment is straightforward, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint has more advanced features but requires a complex setup.
Download BigFix vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
BigFix has moderate setup costs, making it a more economical choice compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which tends to have higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has moderate setup costs, making it a more economical choice compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which tends to have higher initial setup costs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security with centralized management, suitable for organizations seeking robust protection. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR focuses on threat hunting and process insights, appealing to buyers needing detailed forensic analysis.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Huntress Managed EDR provides a cost-effective setup with enhanced support options, highlighting varying approaches to ease of installation and initial expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Huntress Managed EDR provides a cost-effective setup with enhanced support options, highlighting varying approaches to ease of installation and initial expenditures.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for proactive threat hunting and robust threat intelligence integration. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint stands out with real-time attack blocking and comprehensive data analytics. A tech buyer might prefer Check Point for cost-effectiveness and VMware Carbon Black for advanced threat prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is often cited as straightforward and cost-effective, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to incur higher initial setup costs and complexity, reflecting their different approaches to deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is often cited as straightforward and cost-effective, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to incur higher initial setup costs and complexity, reflecting their different approaches to deployment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in support and pricing, offering extensive threat prevention and easy integration. In comparison, Cynet's automated response features and overall value justify its higher cost. Both solutions provide robust security, but Cynet's versatility and automation offer distinct advantages.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cynet Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Cynet, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for users looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Cynet, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for users looking to minimize initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its comprehensive threat intelligence and ease of management. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels with advanced machine learning and robust threat detection. Check Point is favored for user-friendliness, while Bitdefender is valued for extensive security capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a setup cost that users consider substantial, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's setup cost is seen as more reasonable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a setup cost that users consider substantial, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's setup cost is seen as more reasonable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint impresses with pricing and ease of deployment, being cost-effective with a straightforward setup. In comparison, Trellix ENS offers advanced threat prevention and real-time monitoring but is more expensive and has a complex deployment. Check Point is preferred for affordability, Trellix for feature richness.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses with limited funds. Trellix ENS, however, offers a more comprehensive setup with higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses with limited funds. Trellix ENS, however, offers a more comprehensive setup with higher upfront investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive protection and robust network security integrations. In comparison, Malwarebytes provides effective malware detection and a user-friendly management interface. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is cost-effective, while Malwarebytes justifies its higher price with advanced features and real-time threat intelligence.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Malwarebytes, making it less budget-friendly for small businesses. Malwarebytes offers a more affordable setup, attracting cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Malwarebytes, making it less budget-friendly for small businesses. Malwarebytes offers a more affordable setup, attracting cost-conscious users.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers competitive pricing and strong support with automated detection and response. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced features and overall value, providing comprehensive threat protection and integration. Check Point generally has deeper feature sets and effectiveness than Panda.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a low setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a low setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a more economical initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat prevention and forensics, ideal for those prioritizing defense depth. In comparison, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers advanced threat detection and AI analysis, appealing to buyers seeking robust incident response features. Check Point is known for easier deployment, while Cybereason justifies a higher cost with its extensive features.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers a more affordable setup. Cybereason is distinguished by its ease of deployment, while Check Point is noted for its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers a more affordable setup. Cybereason is distinguished by its ease of deployment, while Check Point is noted for its comprehensive security features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and extensive policy management, requiring technical understanding for optimization. In comparison, Norton Small Business provides ease of deployment and affordability with essential malware protection, suitable for cost-conscious SMBs seeking straightforward, user-friendly security solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Norton Small Business Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Norton Small Business. Norton Small Business is more affordable upfront given its lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Norton Small Business. Norton Small Business is more affordable upfront given its lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in threat detection with features like threat emulation and extraction. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance focuses on lightweight AI-driven protection. Check Point's comprehensive capabilities contrast with Cylance's minimal system impact and ease of use.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers more budget-friendly pricing. This distinction in setup costs highlights key differences in initial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, whereas BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers more budget-friendly pricing. This distinction in setup costs highlights key differences in initial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers ease of deployment and superior customer service. In comparison, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response provides comprehensive incident response and automated remediation features. Check Point is initially cost-effective, while Datto, despite higher setup costs, promises better long-term ROI.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making it a more cost-effective choice initially. Datto EDR, while having a higher setup cost, may offer additional features justifying the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making it a more cost-effective choice initially. Datto EDR, while having a higher setup cost, may offer additional features justifying the investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform are top contenders in cybersecurity. Check Point is favored for its comprehensive support and pricing. In comparison, Deep Instinct offers superior threat detection capabilities. Check Point leads in ease of deployment and customer service, while Deep Instinct excels in innovative technology.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers robust features but at a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers robust features but at a higher setup cost.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat prevention and seamless integration with existing security infrastructures. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers robust threat detection, automated response, and detailed visibility into endpoint activities, appealing to those seeking extensive features and reliable performance.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert requires a higher initial investment. Check Point offers an economical setup, whereas Kaspersky demands a more substantial financial commitment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert requires a higher initial investment. Check Point offers an economical setup, whereas Kaspersky demands a more substantial financial commitment upfront.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in support and management, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection has superior performance and features. In comparison, Webroot's cloud-based approach and lighter resource usage provide advantages. Check Point offers comprehensive threat detection, and Webroot ensures efficient scanning with real-time intelligence.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is more affordable to initiate. Webroot offers cost-effective implementation compared to Check Point's higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is more affordable to initiate. Webroot offers cost-effective implementation compared to Check Point's higher upfront investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat prevention and seamless integration, while SonicWall Capture Client offers real-time threat intelligence and effective endpoint detection. In comparison, SonicWall provides easier deployment but requires better scalability, whereas Check Point demands lower resource use and improved reporting tools.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers competitive pricing with reliable support and seamless integration, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, NetWitness NDR provides advanced network traffic analysis and comprehensive threat detection, justifying its higher cost with superior features and enhanced analytical capabilities.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. NetWitness NDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a low initial setup cost, whereas NetWitness NDR involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced feature set and extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a low initial setup cost, whereas NetWitness NDR involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced feature set and extensive capabilities.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security is praised for comprehensive threat detection and cost-effectiveness, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint stands out for advanced threat prevention and extensive features, attracting those looking for superior security and long-term value.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires a higher upfront investment.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for its robust threat prevention and endpoint visibility, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection stands out with advanced threat detection and integrated data loss prevention, providing superior long-term ROI despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being straightforward and affordable, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's setup cost is often seen as higher but justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being straightforward and affordable, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's setup cost is often seen as higher but justified by its advanced features.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in pricing and support while also providing advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites stands out for its expansive threat detection and user-friendly experience. Check Point benefits from better reporting tools, whereas Trend Micro needs improved integration.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, which offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, which offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive security features, including detailed threat detection and integration with other tools. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers ease of deployment, lightweight agents, and advanced malware detection, making it a cost-effective choice for quick implementation.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a more budget-friendly option.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and performance efficiency. In comparison, Sophos EPP Suite offers a comprehensive feature set and advanced protection capabilities. Check Point's ease of deployment and minimal system impact contrast with Sophos's detailed reporting and comprehensive security tools.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Sophos EPP Suite Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is moderately high, while Sophos EPP Suite offers a more affordable setup cost with fewer initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is moderately high, while Sophos EPP Suite offers a more affordable setup cost with fewer initial fees.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5

Halcyon enhances business processes through automation and data analysis. Users appreciate its workflow streamlining, productivity increase, and insightful analytics. Its integration and ease of deployment are frequently highlighted. Robust data handling, real-time processing, and scalability are notable. Improvements are needed in customer service, bug resolution, and system compatibility.

View comparison
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers cost-effective pricing, straightforward deployment, and excellent integration with security tools. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides robust features such as automated threat hunting and advanced analytics, justifying its higher price for those requiring comprehensive security.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are minimal with straightforward implementation, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a mid-tier setup cost with a slightly more intricate setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are minimal with straightforward implementation, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a mid-tier setup cost with a slightly more intricate setup process.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers strong real-time threat intelligence and automated responses, excelling in prevention and remediation, with competitive pricing and seamless integration. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response provides advanced detection and in-depth analytics with detailed reporting, appealing to those needing sophisticated feature sets.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for its moderate setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response typically boasts a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for its moderate setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response typically boasts a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses for these two solutions.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in customer support and comprehensive threat prevention, making it a reliable choice for straightforward deployment and high ROI. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers advanced auto-containment and real-time monitoring but needs improvement in system resource usage and support responsiveness.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. The significant cost difference makes Comodo's solution attractive for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. The significant cost difference makes Comodo's solution attractive for budget-conscious businesses.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
N-able EDR
3.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint Logo
N-able EDR
3.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its comprehensive threat prevention and user-friendly management console, making it a suitable choice for those seeking ease of deployment and customer service. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its robust features, advanced threat detection, and automated response workflows.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
OSZAR »